Rising hardware costs and storage prices in 2026, driven in part by the AI boom, are prompting a call for the widespread adoption of more efficient media formats like AVIF and AV1.

This image provides visual context for the source article's primary argument regarding AVIF adoption.
Economic Pressures on Storage
Storage devices including HDDs, SSDs, and NVMe drives are facing increased prices and supply difficulties in 2026. These hardware costs are being passed down to users as hosting providers raise their service prices.
The demand for hardware is being intensified by the AI boom, creating a situation where storage is less readily available and more expensive for small hosting services and independent websites.
“AVIF generally offers better compression than WebP while maintaining comparable image quality, which means smaller files without sacrificing how an image looks.”
— Isn't It Time for AVIF Everywhere?
Technical Advantages of AVIF
AVIF is proposed as a primary solution for image storage because it provides better compression than WebP without sacrificing visual quality. This efficiency can lead to substantial savings when scaled across the millions of images uploaded daily.
While encoding AVIF images is more CPU-intensive than older formats, the strategy involves encouraging users to convert images on their own hardware before uploading. This approach minimizes the processing burden on hosting infrastructure while preserving the most efficient file format.
Industry Trends and Limitations
The move toward efficiency is mirrored in the video space, where YouTube is preparing to transition from AV1 to AV2 for streaming as early as 2027. This suggests a broader industry shift toward high-efficiency codecs to manage massive data volumes.
Despite the benefits, widespread adoption faces hurdles such as a lack of native support in certain devices, like Fire TV Sticks, and the need for consistent support across different browsers and platforms to avoid the need for manual conversions.
What Hacker News readers are saying
- Open question: One commenter raised a question regarding whether AVIF carries the same patent risks as full or motion AV1, expressing concern about potential legal enforcement against websites. comment ↗
- Experience: A user shared that while they added AVIF support to their tools, they found that WebP still performs better for specific use cases like screenshots. comment ↗
- Alternative: One commenter suggested trying Google's jpegli encoder as an alternative that matches WebP for most image types, while noting that quantized PNG remains best for limited color palettes. comment ↗
- Skeptical: Another commenter argued that image formats are less significant than video formats and suggested that regular JPEG can already be compressed much further. comment ↗
Summarized opinions from the Hacker News thread, not verified facts. Read the full discussion ↗